Gujcet 2008
Gujarat Common Entrance Test

Gujcet Home
 
 
 

Home     Chemistry     Physics      Mathematics     Biology     Gujcet 2007   

Gujcet Results    Answers and Solutions   Coaching Classes    Books

 
 


The Gujarat Common Entrance Test (GUJCET) held for the first time in the State has run into one more controversy. This time, a professor from a medical college has claimed that two of the answers as set in the key-to-GUJCET are wrong, which would pull down a student?s merit even if he has marked the correct answers.

The Gujarat Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board (GSHSEB), which conducted GUJCET on April 15, has prepared the key? the answer sheet, on the basis of which each answer paper will be evaluated by the computer. But the professor, who has managed to get a copy of the key, says that it carries two wrong answers in two different sections.

According to Dr J M Jadeja, Professor & Head, Physiology Department, B J Medical College, for the question number 32 in biology section, the answer as given in the key is not correct. The question: If the potasium channel is open and sodium channel is closed, what is the condition of the membrane?

For the answer, there are four options: (a) depolarisation, (b) resting membrane potential, (c) repolariation, (d) polarisation. Jadeja says the correct option is (c), but in the key it has been given as (b).

Similarly, the question number 33 in physics section has four options but none of them is correct. The question: The colour of the wave is due to which quality of the wave? The answer options are: (a) frequency, (b) velocity (c) vibraton, (d) wavelength. Jadeja says none of the four options in this is correct, but the key says option (a) is correct.

The evaluation of the answer paper is done with help of an optical reader mark, which uses magnetic chip to read the option selected by the student and feeds it into the computer. The computer generates the result and also prepares the merit list. Jadeja says the inorrect options in these two questions will affect the students.

??I submitted the correction to the chairman of the board on April 19 and 20, but no action has been taken so far. If the board continues with the same key, it will affect the students badly,?? he said.

He says unless the options are corrected by the board, the students who might have attempted the questions correctly will lose ranks in the merit list. ??The total number of seats in the State medical colleges is 875, of which 15 per cent is reserved for all-India quota and 49.5 per cent for SC/ST and OBC categories. In this backdrop, general students will lose out on getting seats,?? Jadeja said.

While GSHSEB chairman was not available for comments, its secretary V B Nanavati said that they were checking it. ??We have sent a fax to the exam wing and they are verifying it,?? aid Nanavati.

The exam co-ordinator, Bharat Upadhyay, however said that the claims made by the professor were ??not correct??. He said that the board was examining the things before reaching any conclusion.

A similar case had happened in Maharashtra in 2004, when the High Court had passed an order to suspend the admissions and prepare fresh merit list after doing reassessment.

Jadeja also said that the negative marking concept in GUJCET would hamper students on the merit list.

The questions in the three setions are objective type and each of them carries one mark for correct answer. But for each wrong answer, the student gets 0.25 as negative mark. ??But actually, the total mark loss to the student in case of a wrong answer is 1.25 marks,?? he opined.

The GUJCET question paper has three sections, each of which carries 40 marks, making the total marks 120 for the paper.


 

News Source: Yahoo.

 

Gujcet is Conducted by GSEB (Gujarat State Education Board)

Home  |   Chemistry  |   Physics   |   Mathematics    News   |  Gujcet 2007   |  Gujcet Results

Gujcet.info

      Contact Us

Privacy Policy